✈️ Exclusive Benefits for Readers
Verified codes to save on your next trip.
A few days ago the media noise began that was seen coming a few months ago, the start of construction of the new airport was delayed, But why was the construction of the new Daular Airport postponed??
Possibly, remember that a few months ago I published a mega post about the story, present, airlines and the construction project they call «Mega Aeropuerto Daular«.
In that post and at least 6 years ago, the Guayaquil authorities with much fanfare had announced that for this year 2018 would begin the construction of such an emblematic project: www.nlarenas.com/2017/06/guayaquil-2018-mega-aeropuerto-daular/.
This project would be or will be the largest airport in the region, thought to have 3 landing strips in their final stage, adaptable and modal terminal so that in its first stage it can support a traffic of 10 million passengers per year and could easily increase to more than 25 millions.
In a land 2.020 acres the possibilities are almost limitless. In this space, the airport would have an enviable growth capacity throughout the region and with one of its 3 tracks with 4.100 meters long, would allow longer direct flights to connect Ecuador with the world.
Why was the construction of the new Daular Airport postponed??
the answer is very easy: both national and international passenger traffic does not justify such a large investment today.
The statistics speak for themselves. Guayaquil Airport in recent years has seen how the number of users does not grow at the rate or speed that a mega investment requires to be justified before investors and municipal authorities.
Despite this growth that exists, the numbers are still not favorable to be able to make an investment that could exceed the $900 million dollars in a construction period of 6 years.
The current terminal has a capacity to handle 7 million and a half passengers per year after the latest extension and improvement launched just last year 2014, and the almost 4 current millions still make it a comfortable terminal and far from collapsing, as it does happen in other airports in the region, such as Lima.
What factors have influenced?
- Quito airport: There are two points here that need to be clarified..
- First, Tababela in its beginnings did affect domestic traffic in all airports in the country, generated exclusively by the lack of access roads at its inauguration, but in international traffic this airport continues to grow. Ecuadorians were not used to that distance and time, this landscape has been changing.
- The second, and the most important, is due to the significant attraction of new airlines, frequencies and increased capacity generated thanks to the new facilities, like the runway. How does this affect Guayaquil?? It will be clarified below.
- Economy: It is known that Ecuador has not been in the best economic condition for several years, less income or mistrust, people consume less, therefore travel less, spending less to secure the future.
- fuel subsidy: the elimination of the jet fuel subsidy in the year 2015 brought a significant drop in passenger traffic throughout the country, especially on the Quito route – Guayaquil, which until then was the second most important in Latin America in terms of passengers and daily frequencies.
- distances: new roads have decreased ground travel times and is the main competition for airlines and airports.
- city factor: as i said in the first point, Quito has managed to attract new airlines and frequencies (here I explain it), especially in the international, but this has to do with this aeronautical phrase that I love: «Airlines fly where the business is, where there are passengers.
- Guayaquil is the most populous city in Ecuador, but this does not mean that people fly more than in Quito. The capital of Ecuador has fewer inhabitants, but its people fly more, both domestically and internationally. if people don't fly, the airlines will not arrive.
- We are a very small country, despite the fact that both Quito and Guayaquil are important economically and populationally, airlines prefer to operate to a single airport, to the one that will leave the most profit and reach the other in agreement with social or local airlines. Let's say airline X arrives in Quito and connects to Guayaquil local Z, This way you do not spend on personnel and operations in two airports so close.
- Factor Tame: it's no secret to anyone, the Tame crisis affected all airports. They reduced frequencies, they canceled routes and moved others. In the case of Guayaquil, Tame canceled the route to Esmeraldas, Latacunga – Coca and recently to Cuenca, while it also reduced the frequencies to Loja. in the international, moved the most demanded route from Guayaquil, which is New York, to Quito. This year he opened the way to Bogota and keep flying to Fort Lauderdale, help numbers.
- Factor airlines: by the same city factor, Guayaquil has lost Iberia flights, Delta y United, which clearly reduces their numbers and projections. He has won those of Spirit Airlines and Air Europa, but they do not replace the ones that have already left. We hope they return with the numbers on the rise.
- Taxes and fees: the tax factor was discussed in this post and I recommend that you read it and see it in detail: www.nlarenas.com/2018/02/entrevista-costos-tasas-aeroportuarias-quito-guayaquil/
- Ticket costs: the tickets in Ecuador are expensive and you can read that analysis here: www.nlarenas.com/2017/09/por-que-son-tan-caros-los-pasajes-aereos-en-ecuador/. This affects the entire local industry, with more competition, all stakeholders will benefit.
- tourism promotion: Guayaquil has ceded land in a tourist way in front of Quito, where investment to be the gateway to Ecuador It has been superior and the results are evident.
Guayaquil Airport passenger statistics
The municipal authorities of Guayaquil have indicated that to begin construction of the new airport, international passenger traffic has to reach the 3.5 million annually, they are far away now. What is happening at the José Joaquín de Olmedo, is that the airport is growing, but not at the rate 2011 O 2014 and 2015, but growing as the statistics show:
| 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |
| 3.458.854 | 3.716.926 | 3.820.669 | 3.884.068 | |
| Variation | 7,5% | 2,8% | 1,7% |
There is a brake on growth, Yes, but that is not why the airport has stopped growing, although globally, have 1 million passengers less than the Quito Airport and a mega investment such as Daular, it's excessive right now.
Domestic passenger statistics
In domestic flights we see a growth from the 2016, but that still has not reached the best year compared, which is the 2015:
| 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |
| TOTAL | 1,803,274 | 2,184,882 | 2,052,315 | 2,085,389 |
Passengers on domestic routes
The effect of Tame on the routes to Latacunga is clear, Esmeraldas, Loja and Cuenca, plus the noticeable drop in traffic between Quito and Guayaquil after the elimination of the fuel subsidy, although it has grown mainly thanks to the routes to Galapagos:
| ROUTES | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
| QUITO-GUAYAQUIL | 833.366 | 739.009 | 693.950 | 693.872 |
| GUAYAQUIL-QUITO | 824.081 | 722.226 | 690.049 | 727.164 |
| GUAYAQUIL-CUENCA | 35.515 | 31.357 | 20.114 | 2.550 |
| CUENCA-GUAYAQUIL | 35.763 | 33.353 | 20.079 | 4129 |
| QUITO-GUAYAQUIL-BALTRA | 215.016 | 220.315 | 249608 | |
| BALTRA-GUAYAQUIL-QUITO | 219.198 | 214.488 | 232653 | |
| QUITO-GUAYAQUIL-SAN CRISTOBAL | 74.087 | 73.039 | 82295 | |
| SAN CRISTOBAL-GUAYAQUIL-QUITO | 66.908 | 68.469 | 74915 | |
| GUAYAQUIL-LATACUNGA | 7.617 | 12.027 | 3.395 | 304 |
| LATACUNGA-GUAYAQUIL | 6.209 | 11.139 | 3.382 | 235 |
| GUAYAQUIL-LOJA | 17.730 | 16.973 | 11.410 | 8063 |
| LOJA-GUAYAQUIL | 16.966 | 16.604 | 11.599 | 7584 |
| GUAYAQUIL-ESMERALDAS | 13.843 | 14.259 | 10.943 | 0 |
| EMERALDS-GUAYAQUIL | 12.184 | 12.726 | 9.067 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 1.803.274 | 2.184.882 | 2.052.315 | 2.085.389 |
International passenger statistics
Year 2017, It was the best year for the Guayaquil Airport in recent years. 4 years, a major boost, but very far from 3 million and a half that the authorities seek to start construction:
| 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |
| TOTAL | 1,655,580 | 1,532,044 | 1,768,354 | 1,798,679 |
Passengers on international routes
The 2017 It was also the best year internationally and far exceeds the 2014. The route to Panama is the one that grows the most and the one that moves the most passengers in Guayaquil, followed by Bogota and Miami, although the latter shows a decrease in passengers transported in the 2017. New York also lowers its number of passengers, once again for the Tame effect:
| ROUTES | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
| AMSTERDAM | 92.914 | 96.359 | 99.601 | 99.111 |
| ARUBA | N/A | N/A | 326 | 594 |
| BARCELONA (VENEZUELA) | N/A | 5.056 | 40.817 | 43.994 |
| BOGOTA | 204.235 | 201.762 | 199.995 | 237.534 |
| GOOD AIR | 54.847 | 13.230 | N/A | N/A |
| CALI | 30.942 | 32.882 | 32.616 | 41.347 |
| CARACAS | 39 | N/A | 335 | N/A |
| THE SAVIOR | 55.529 | 61.032 | 49.547 | 50.657 |
| FOR LAUDERDALE | 3.795 | 25.936 | 41.174 | 51.251 |
| PEACE | N/A | N/A | 3.034 | 4.270 |
| LIMA | 179.470 | 154.954 | 182.691 | 192.709 |
| MADRID | 108.176 | 107.786 | 118.092 | 166.700 |
| MIAMI | 252.455 | 256.745 | 242.562 | 229.414 |
| NEW YORK | 261.919 | 156.915 | 267.583 | 185.949 |
| PANAMA | 324.383 | 342.874 | 392.997 | 398.240 |
| SANTIAGO | 86.876 | 76.513 | 96.984 | 96.909 |
| TOTAL | 1,655,580 | 1,532,044 | 1,768,354 | 1,798,679 |
Passenger statistics Quito Airport
As a reference and to understand that traffic has also been affected throughout Ecuador, It is good to know the data of the main Ecuadorian airport in domestic and international.
Quito's statistics show, unlike Guayaquil, a decrease the years 2015 and 2016, generated exclusively by domestic flights, since international growth is maintained every year. just the 2017 global growth returned, although driven by the international with 1.5% and -0.9% in the domestic:
| 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |
| 5.421.106 | 5.574.019 | 5.376.544 | 4.852.530 | 4.875.166 | |
| Variation | 2.4% | 2.8% | -3.5% | -9.7% | 0.5% |
*Average variation corresponds to national and international traffic.
Until May 2018, Quito Airport has seen a increase of 4.6% compared to the year 2017, having served in 5 months to 2,058,554 passenger.
** DGAC Statistics, Municipality of Quito and others.
Passenger projections Guayaquil Airport
With current data and based on the growth of the last 4 years, just for the year 2031 Guayaquil Airport would pass the 3 million and a half passengers, taking into account the averages and a projection model:

For that same year 2031, Guayaquil Airport would arrive at 6 million one hundred thousand passengers between domestic and international based on current growth averages. with this number, the airport would still have capacity for 1 million and a half more passengers before reaching its peak:

An additional exercise playing with numbers, if the average annual growth were 8% (varying between the 9% and 7 %), the goal of 3.5 million passengers would be fulfilled before the year 2026:

What can be done?
Guayaquil Airport already has incentives for new airlines, they are doing all this, it is very positive, you have to keep it and push it. The image of the city must be improved as an attractive and profitable destination for these companies, that does not depend on the airport directly.
The Airport cannot do anything about the country's economy, does not correspond to him and is oblivious to his activities. Either, can compete with ground transportation, nor with the city factor, but it can help, ask for help or support for the generation of attraction campaigns, as general ideas being part of tourism fairs, aviation like Routes and others.
Guayaquil as a city, must improve its tourist image worldwide, this corresponds to both the Municipality and the Ecuadorian Government. It depends on this that more foreigners want to fly to Ecuador, therefore more airlines, without forgetting that the people of Guayaquil must also fly abroad, and there, the elimination of the Eco Delta Tax would be very good to reduce the cost of tickets and for more Ecuadorians to fly (help the whole country).
Carrying out market studies for potential new domestic routes is also necessary and that is mainly the job of the airlines., but you must work together and in alliances to generate these documents that will generate benefits for the airport, City and country. For example, a direct route from Guayaquil to El Coca or Lago Agrio could be very attractive., studies will tell.
A differentiating factor must be sought and exploited. Guayaquil is the main economic city of the country, this should be a plus and search for example, the business passenger as a source of growth and attraction of airlines whose business is in that niche.
there's so much more to do, but mainly in a personal way, it's on how to promote, both airport and city. Both must work for a single purpose., not thinking only about the construction of the Daular, but also, in the socio-economic development of the city, that as a benefit it will have to reach the 8 million passengers that allow to start or think about the construction of the Mega Airport.
the only way to grow, is that frequencies are increased, new airlines arrive, destinations that are not currently flown are exploited, those that have left will resume and a great boost will be domestic flights, Much depends on local policies such as the revision of taxes that make tickets more expensive and slow down the air market., that throughout the world is the fundamental axis of development and economy.
short term challenge
The main challenge, given the indefinite postponement of the construction of Daular, It is on the runway at the Guayaquil Airport. The useful life of the last general asphalting ends quickly given the climatic conditions and normal use of the operations.
the track of 2.790 meters, already requires several closures where emergent works are carried out several times, during the year, for patching of the asphalt layer that is worn and affected by the continuous use and normal wear and tear of the operation of the more than 120 daily operations carried out there.

The authorities will now have to locate a specific budget to extend the useful life of the track, possibly requiring a full intervention, with its operational closures for several days to weeks, all depending on how this job is done.
This general and complete maintenance of the track will have to be carried out sooner or later, with the consequent inconvenience for airlines and users due to the closures that will have to be carried out.
In this years, you can seek to continue improving current operations, update procedures and systems to keep the airport current and on par with the rest of the airports in the region, that until today, is over the vast majority.
When will Daular be built? There is no exact date and it will be now, very difficult to know exactly until the authorities in a few years, announce it again.
*** The reason for this post is to show a different vision of what is happening with the Guayaquil Airport and to propose some ideas, that are surely being worked on or have been thought of before.
What should be done to boost the growth of this airport?
✈️ Exclusive Benefits for Readers
Search here for hotels ALL over the world at the best price.





I think the same as Cmdte Edwin Suarez
Here they lack vision. Example: The Savior, The city of Salvador has a small tourist offer, however it is a hub of connections. Guayaquil, due to its location, could be an excellent hub that can compete and be an alternative to Jorge Chávez airport in Lima or El Dorado airport in Bogotá, which are at full capacity.. It is a lack of vision to justify that the passenger traffic of 7 millions do not justify it, you should think with a mentality from here to 20 years and the statistical projection should be exponentially increasing considering the potential benefits of a hub.
It is important to lower taxes and fuel and allow the sustained growth of the flow of passengers to be the decisive element to start the construction of the new airport.
900 million is nothing calculated to 50 years.
Greetings
Fantastic Nicholas, unbiased and very professional analysis, I think your type of analysis is unique in the country. I have two concerns and I would like to know your comments… Do you think that the Quito airport needs an expansion?? and second, Guayaquil being a maritime port, It takes space away from the airport, unlike Quito , that without a port is strengthened in its air cargo ( example the flowers ) ? Thank you for your kind comments…
Thank you Carlos for your comment.. In fact, Quito Airport is already expanding, they will finish it during the 2020. The Port is undoubtedly a direct competition for GYE.
Many of us agree that the regionalism factor is the one that prevails in Ecuador
Quito is the capital and has its natural advantages that no one disputes, but it is very true of the pressure from the authorities to further favor Quito in all aeronautical aspects of new airlines induced to fly to Quito and not to Guayaquil
Someone asked about the Avianca Guayaquil Buenos Aires route and no one answered. The answer is that before the "open skies" that route was tame and I never loosen it despite the fact that it was never able to operate it, then they already forgot and they did it from Quito
Better not ask to remove ashes that the truth can be expensive
It is time to let the principle announced by Nicolas take effect
The airlines fly where the passengers are, which is true as long as they do not put obstacles or pressure or insinuations, how to want them to fly to Salinas Santa Rosa among others and spend millions uselessly where there are no passengers
You have evidence to say that Quito is favored over Guayaquil or that the routes are "induced"? Tame's route to Buenos Aires always operated from Quito and Avianca Ecuador intended to operate it doing Quito – Guayaqil – Buenos Aires, always starting in Quito and the open skies have nothing to do with this.
Nicholas, Cheers. I am glad to know how well informed you are with the figures you present.. The common mortal does not know them for their different activities. I see it normal.
The issue of regionalism and centralism is big. You can't compete against that., nor is it your role to analyze it in this forum. Anywhere in the world the capital of a country, It has its advantages that are increased by the way of doing politics in this Ecuador.
Thank you Ignatius, Cheers!
Another important factor is that at the current airport, people who arrive from the provinces by bus are at the bus terminal, which is close to the airport., On the other hand, in Daular a race would be very expensive
It could also be an additional factor.
Good Morning:
I understood that Avianca considered the Guayaquil route – Buenos Aires, who knows about the subject ??
Greetings
JIMMY
This was the last that was known: http://www.nlarenas.com/2017/08/avianca-ecuador-pide-volar-buenos-aires/
Estimated:
Lately I read your column that I think is very good, I want to express my comment .
Unfortunately, regionalism prevails on this issue. Much has been done to annoy and annoy the operation of this airport
Tame previously flew the Guayaquil route – New York which was transferred to Quito. I understand that the Guayaquil route – New York is very profitable and had a very high occupancy, hence the transfer of the operation to Quito is not understood unless it is a question of favoring one airport to the detriment of another.
It is indicated that the city has not been adequately promoted, this is also a regional issue. I have had the opportunity to travel abroad and government entities promote Quito in the first place, the east and the Galapagos Islands; Guayaquil does not exist for them; I remember a comment, if I remember correctly, from an official of the Guayaquil Airport Authority who indicated that on a flight that was bound for Quito (Tame's Flight) A passenger found out that Guayaquil "existed" and when he consulted aircraft personnel, they told him loose bones. "Nothing good is lost."
It is indicated that in Guayaquil there is no passenger demand, I don't know figures but the fact that Quito has more flights is explained by the fact that the embassies are in Quito, government agencies, etc. and this obviously creates a demand. In Guayaquil there is demand what there are not are accessible flights except with stopovers .
Hi jimmy, Thank you very much for your comment. Regarding regionalism, it is not my responsibility to analyze it, more than aeronautics and even, tourist. The issue of transfers of government entities, embassies, etc. Yes, favors Quito, but there Guayaquil should look for a way to differentiate itself and promote itself in another way, with self-management.
regionalism ??????!!!!!!!!!!!
Don't touch that topic
Excellent analysis that was made of the problems facing the growth of passengers, however, a fundamental issue that should be analyzed was not found, the offer of a new airport.
Large airports with a large flow of passengers such as Bogotá and Lima, they are increasingly with less space to handle flights, and this does not mean that all passengers visit Colombia or Peru, it's just transit airports, for connections; Another example that can be cited is the San Salvador airport, which the 90% of passengers use it for connections. In other words, if the authorities decided on the immediate construction of the Guayaquil airport, it is much easier to offer it as a new Holding for companies like AVIANCA or LATAM who have the capacity to grow but lack space; For this reason, I dare say that the tourist attraction or the economy of a city or country is not necessary for it to have a mega airport and for it to operate profitably., but rather the offer and competitiveness that it can offer to the market so that it is attractive to invest and bet on it., call it taxes or bureaucratic obstacles; and by the hand of this work, take advantage of the source of work and income that would represent not only the city but the country, to increase the internal tourist offer, attracting new visitors.
The theme of a HUB is that Lima and Bogotá are the strengths of both airlines and they will not sacrifice what they have achieved there to give it to them and start from scratch in a new one.. Although it is an interesting idea that in the face of the collapse of, for example, Lima, some flights move to Guayaquil, It is not attractive because in Guayaquil passengers must also get on the plane and not only in connection, that's the problem.
Excellent explanation Nicholas, especially with numerical data that reflect the reality of air traffic in Ecuador.
The authorities should continue working so that the costs of the tickets go down, airport taxes…. Suddenly, local airlines form subsidiaries to offer commercial services and cargo to and from small airports with aircraft that adapt to the needs and thus provide more connectivity as TAME Amazonía does. There are underutilized airports where cargo transportation could be an option to attract investment.
there's a lot to do, you just have to do and want to do it.
It is reality what I say, but I ask, The AAG is said to have increased the rates of use of the airport and it is said that they are higher than that of Quito. is this true?
What do the city authorities do to convince us Guyaquileños to use our airport?, With that, the companies would be forced to share frequencies with Quito and not force us to use the one from there..
Guayaquil was the port of departure for travelers from the basin, machala, manabi, the rivers, apart from Guayaquil, but for example, At the time that Tame eliminates the basin route to Guayaquil, Cuencanos will have the connection to Quito, losing that logical place for our airport.
Travel agencies in our city must work with our airport , For that, they need advantages that aeronautical policies should provide..
I read the worst scenario will occur when we Guayquileños will have to travel to Quito to take an international connection, with the inconvenience that this implies and the tremendous loss of time that occurs when a connection is made in tababela. Obviously, the operator of the Tababela airport is interested in gaining more users, for the same reason our authority must fight.
Excuse me for asking these questions, I do it as a Guayaquil citizen concerned about our city and our rights. I do not do it for the purpose of criticism, just to know the subject better and know the reasons and struggles that we have to assume for our well-being.
Greetings
I recommend this post about the rates of Guayaquil and Quito: http://www.nlarenas.com/2018/02/entrevista-costos-tasas-aeroportuarias-quito-guayaquil/